More than ninety-five percent of people who read this are doing it for free. Only a tiny percentage invest in this work. Be one of the few. Become a paid subscriber today.
When people hear “Ku Klux Klan,” they think hoods, nooses, and burning crosses—relics of a distant past.
But the Klan wasn’t just a hate group; it was a political and religious movement.
And if you understand the history of what they believed, you’ll recognize the same ideology resurfacing in today’s white Christian nationalism.
I’ve been hesitant to say this out loud.
As a historian, I am careful about drawing direct lines from the present to the past.
History doesn’t repeat itself—it’s too complex and too contextual. But sometimes history rhymes so loudly you can no longer ignore the echoes.
After countless hours studying Klan documents, rituals, speeches, and theology—and comparing them with what we see today—I am prepared to make this claim clearly:
There is a direct ideological line from the Ku Klux Klan to modern white Christian nationalism.
This is not a clickbait claim. It is a historically grounded conclusion.
The Ideological DNA the Klan Passed Down
When you strip away the robes and the rituals, the Klan’s ideology rested on four pillars: white supremacy, xenophobia, patriarchy, and a religious justification for all three.
William J. Simmons, who revived the Klan in 1915, laid out the criteria for belonging:
native-born, white, Gentile, Protestant Americans. He claimed the Klan sought a “restoration” of America—an imagined past where the nation was racially pure, culturally homogenous, and governed by “Christian principles.”
When you read that alongside today’s deep story of White Christian nationalism—America as a Christian nation founded by white men, blessed by God, threatened by outsiders, and in need of restoration—the parallels are unmistakable.
The verbiage has changed. The project has not.
Why I Haven’t Said This Until Now
I’m a historian, so I refuse to make lazy historical comparisons.
Too often, people invoke the past without doing the research—calling every enemy “Hitler,” every threat “fascism,” every injustice “slavery.”
Those shortcuts flatten history and obscure the real stakes.
That’s why I avoided saying “the KKK and White Christian nationalism are connected” until I had the receipts.
After studying the Klan’s language, rituals, membership requirements, political theology, and obsession with “restoration,” I now believe the evidence is overwhelming.
But precision is still necessary.
We Must Compare Carefully
To say the ideologies share a lineage is not to say they are identical.
The Klan was an organized fraternal order engaged in explicit racial terrorism.
White Christian nationalism today is an ideology, not a membership organization.
There are also important differences in religious participation—Jewish and Catholic individuals, for example, can be active in the modern movement, which would have been unthinkable for Simmons’ Klan.
Failing to name these differences leads to historical sloppiness. But failing to name the similarities leads to national amnesia.
And the similarities are substantial:
A mythic Christian past
A fear of racial and cultural “replacement”
A belief that God uniquely blesses America
A willingness to use coercion—even violence—to “save the nation”
When nearly four in ten White Christian nationalism adherents agree that “true patriots may have to resort to violence,” the past is not past.
The Klan may be past tense, but its ideology is not. Now we must choose whether to baptize it or bury it for good.
Join Me for What Comes Next
This work—naming these patterns with clarity, grounding them in evidence, and helping the public recognize the stakes—is at the center of my next chapter.
I want you to hear more about the broader project I’m building at the intersection of faith, history, and justice.
Join me this Sunday, December 7 at 4 p.m. ET online for a live Vision Casting Meeting
It’s free. It’s important. And it’s where we chart what comes next together. Register now.
